ArticleBMJ open2024
Knowledge, attitudes and practices around urinary tract infections of general practitioners in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional internet survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare providers' perspectives on collaboration of care for acute cystitis in women and the role of the community pharmacy: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practice around urinary tract infections of general practice assistants in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional internet survey.BMC primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common reason for women to consult a general practitioner (GP). Current diagnostic tests are inadequate, complicating diagnosis and treatment decisions for GPs. To understand how this influences GPs in managing UTI, we aimed to determine GPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices around UTI care.
designCross-sectional internet-based survey.
settingGeneral practice in the Netherlands between December 2021 and February 2022.
participantsWe distributed invitations to participate via email to 126 practices. Additionally, we distributed invitations via social media and newsletters. OUTCOMES: The survey included 15 questions covering GPs' sociodemographic information, knowledge, attitudes and practices. Data analysis was based on frequencies and descriptive statistics.
resultsAmong the 190 eligible respondents, 172 (90.5%) chose dysuria and 140 (73.7%) chose urinary frequency as a symptom likely indicating UTI in healthy women. One in three GPs would diagnose a UTI based on non-specific complaints with positive leucocyte and erythrocyte tests, discordant with established guidelines. GPs indicated that better point-of-care diagnostics would help improve antibiotic prescribing (72.6%) and would conserve time (60.0%). GPs considered a positive test result the most important factor to prescribe antibiotics while patient expectation was considered least important. Half of GPs indicated that the most urgent need in UTI care is improved diagnostics.
conclusionGPs often act in discordance with established guidelines, rely on non-specific symptoms for the diagnosis of UTI and rank patient expectation as less important in comparison to symptom recognition and culture result when deciding on antibiotic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.