Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461842›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2024

Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection following occupational ocular exposure.

Patricia Mosset, Catherine Lazor-Blanchet

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia MossetCHUV, Médecine du Personnel et d'Entreprise, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland Patricia.Mosset@chuv.ch.
Catherine Lazor-BlanchetCHUV, Médecine du Personnel et d'Entreprise, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A man in his mid-20s presented to the occupational health service following an ocular projection with a concentrated solution of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV clone-13). Subsequently, a regular clinical and biological follow-up was initiated. 7 days after exposure, the patient developed influenza-like symptoms. During the acute phase, specific RT-PCR testing of blood plasma was negative for LCMV. Symptomatic treatment was administered, and the symptoms resolved after a few days. The patient remained asymptomatic in the following weeks. Serological follow-up detected a seroconversion 6 weeks after exposure, indicating a recent infection. The occupational health service's protocol, comprising clinical monitoring and serological surveillance, facilitated the detection of seroconversion. This case underscores ocular mucosal exposure as a route of occupational LCMV transmission, which is often not considered. It served as an opportunity to review and enhance prevention measures and laboratory protocols within the biosafety level P2 facility.

Indexed as

Lymphocytic ChoriomeningitisLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusOccupational ExposureAdultHumansMaleAccidents, injuriesExposuresInfection (neurology)Meningitis

Identifiers

PMID39461842
PMCPMC11557448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.