Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461793›Full record

SynthesisLancet (London, England)2024

Tranexamic acid for postpartum bleeding: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Katharine Ker, Loïc Sentilhes, Haleema Shakur-Still, Hugo Madar, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, George Saade, Luis D Pacheco, François-Xavier Ageron, Raoul Mansukhani, Eni Balogun and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Tranexamic acid in shoulder surgery: a narrative review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Katharine KerClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: katharine.ker@lshtm.ac.uk.
Loïc SentilhesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Haleema Shakur-StillClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Hugo MadarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Catherine Deneux-TharauxObstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, U1153, INSERM, INRAE, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
George SaadeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VI, USA.
Luis D PachecoDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.
François-Xavier AgeronDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Raoul MansukhaniClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Eni BalogunClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Amy BrennerClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Danielle ProwseClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Monica ArribasClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Homa AhmadziaInova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA; George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Rizwana ChaudhriGlobal Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Oladapo OlayemiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan College of Medicine Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ian RobertsClinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Anti-fibrinolytics Trialists Collaborators Obstetric Group

Funding

OPTIMUM OB-TXA: Optimal TIMing, route and dose of tranexamic acid prior to UMbilical cord clamp for postpartum hemorrhage preventionR01HD110109 · NICHD · INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES · PI Homa Khorrami Ahmadzia · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Gates Foundation INV-007787NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD110109Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranexamic acid is a recommended treatment for women with a clinical diagnosis of postpartum haemorrhage, but whether it can prevent bleeding is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to assess the effects of tranexamic acid in women giving birth.

methodsIn this systematic review and IPD meta-analysis, we searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to Aug 4, 2024 for randomised trials that assessed the effects of tranexamic acid in women giving birth. Trials were eligible if they were prospectively registered, placebo-controlled, included more than 500 women, and had a low risk of bias for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. IPD were requested from the trial investigators. The primary outcomes were the numbers of women with life-threatening bleeding and thromboembolic events. We used a one-stage model to analyse the data and explored whether the effect of tranexamic acid varied by the underlying risk of life-threatening bleeding, type of birth, presence of moderate or severe anaemia, or timing of administration (before or after a diagnosis of postpartum haemorrhage). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022345775.

findingsWe analysed data on 54 404 women from five trials. We obtained IPD for 43 409 women from four trials and aggregate data on 10 995 women from one trial. All trials had a low risk of bias. Life-threatening bleeding occurred in 178 (0·65%) of 27 300 women in the tranexamic acid group versus 230 (0·85%) of 27 093 women in the placebo group (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0·77 [95% CI 0·63-0·93]; p=0·008). There was no evidence that the effect of tranexamic acid varied by the underlying risk of life-threatening bleeding, type of birth, presence of moderate or severe anaemia or timing of administration. No significant difference was identified between tranexamic acid and placebo groups with regard to thromboembolic events: 50 (0·2%) of 26 571 women in the tranexamic acid group had fatal or non-fatal thromboembolic events versus 52 (0·2%) of 26 373 women in the placebo group (pooled OR 0·96 [0·65-1·41]; p=0·82) with no significant heterogeneity identified in the subgroup analyses.

interpretationTranexamic acid reduces the risk of life-threatening postpartum bleeding. We found no evidence that tranexamic acid increases the risk of thrombosis. Although we do not recommend the use of tranexamic acid in all women giving birth, consideration should be given to its use before a diagnosis of postpartum haemorrhage in women at high risk of death.

fundingThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsPostpartum HemorrhageTranexamic AcidFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThromboembolismAntifibrinolytic AgentsTranexamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID39461793
PMCPMC12197804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.