Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461773›Full record

Trial reportESMO open2024

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (final analysis of RATIONALE-304: a randomized phase III trial).

S Lu, J Wang, Y Yu, X Yu, Y Hu, Z Ma, X Li, W He, Y Bao, M Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S LuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: shunlu@sjtu.edu.cn.
J WangCancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing, China.
Y YuHarbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Harbin, China.
X YuZhejiang Cancer Hospital, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hangzhou, China.
Y HuHubei Cancer Hospital, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Wuhan, China.
Z MaHenan Cancer Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhengzhou, China.
X LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University/Henan Cancer Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Zhengzhou, China.
W HeBeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Y BaoBeiGene (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
M WangPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to report an updated, final analysis with longer follow-up for the open-label phase III RATIONALE-304 study of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC). MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV nsq-NSCLC were randomized (2 : 1) to 4-6 cycles of tislelizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy and pemetrexed every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance tislelizumab and pemetrexed, or platinum-based chemotherapy and pemetrexed alone every 3 weeks followed by maintenance pemetrexed. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS

resultsOverall, 334 patients were randomized (tislelizumab plus chemotherapy: n = 223; chemotherapy: n = 111). At final analysis (median follow-up 16.1 months), safety/tolerability profiles in both arms were consistent with the interim analysis. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate prolongation of PFS

conclusionsAfter longer follow-up, first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate a manageable safety profile and a favorable PFS benefit over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced/metastatic nsq-NSCLC.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPemetrexedProgression-Free SurvivalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedPemetrexedtislelizumabanti-PD-1 antibodyfirst linenon-small-cell lung cancerstage IIIB-IVtislelizumab

Identifiers

PMID39461773
PMCPMC11549519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.