Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2025
Duration of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients: Evaluation of the Duration of Therapy for Thrombosis in Children (Kids-DOTT) trial outcomes at 2 years.
Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ASH/ISTH 2026 guidelines for anticoagulant prophylaxis in pediatric patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- Relationship between sociodemographic characteristics at presentation and outcomes of provoked venous thromboembolism in United States children: a secondary analysis of the multinational Kids-duration of therapy for thrombosis trial.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Trial
- Neonatal Thromboembolic Disease: Clinical Spectrum and Emerging Evidence for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies Addressing Unmet Needs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Endovascular Management of Pediatric Deep Venous Thrombosis.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Multicenter Evaluation of the Duration of Therapy for Thrombosis in Children multinational, randomized clinical trial revealed noninferiority of a 6-week vs 3-month duration of anticoagulation for the treatment of provoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients <21 years old in regard to net clinical benefit at 1 year.
objectivesTo evaluate noninferiority at 2 years.
methodsPatients whose repeat imaging 6 weeks after VTE diagnosis did not show complete veno-occlusion were randomized to discontinue anticoagulation vs receive a total 3-month course and followed for 2 years for the occurrence of symptomatic recurrent VTE (efficacy outcome) and clinically relevant bleeding (safety outcome). Outcomes were centrally adjudicated, and net clinical benefit was compared between treatment arms via a prespecified bivariate noninferiority boundary, using 95% CIs in absolute risk differences between treatment arms.
resultsKaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year cumulative incidences in the 6-week and 3-month arms of the intention-to-treat population (n = 417) were 1.7% (95% CI, 0%, 3.7%) and 2.9% (95% CI, 0.3%, 5.4%), respectively, for symptomatic recurrent VTE and 1.1% (95% CI, 0%, 2.5%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 0.6%, 5.7%), respectively, for clinically relevant bleeding. Bivariate analysis of the absolute risk differences in the intention-to-treat population demonstrated that a 6-week anticoagulation duration was noninferior to a 3-month course.
conclusionThese findings support durability of the Kids-DOTT randomized clinical trial findings of net clinical benefit at 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.