ArticleThe journal of pain2025
A conceptual model for assessing the risk of unidentified pain.
Article in The journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Untreated or undertreated pain is well established as a significant problem, but unidentified pain is a distinct construct that still needs to be clearly modeled or fully described. This paper aims to develop a conceptual model of unidentified pain in humans with the goal of future development of an unidentified pain risk tool. A multi-phase process was employed consisting sequentially of 1) brainstorming followed by consensus building, 2) peer-review and publication of an integrative theoretical review protocol for "unidentified pain," 3) conduct of the integrative review, and 4) a repeated brainstorming session to identify areas of risk for unidentified pain to produce a conceptual model. Brainstorming led to a consensus on "unidentified pain" as the concept of interest, followed by developing a review protocol. Twenty-four abstracts were reviewed after database searches, and four articles were included for full-text review. Three pain risk areas (hazards) were identified: cognition/communication problems, being alone or in the absence of a surrogate/proxy report, and the presence of known painful conditions or treatments and a conceptual model was developed. The hazards are posited to have the potential to both interact and be cumulative, increasing the risk for unidentified pain. There is currently no risk tool for assessing unidentified pain. The development of this conceptual model will be used for future development and psychometric testing of a tool to recognize the risk for unidentified pain in humans. PERSPECTIVE: This focus article describes the development a conceptual model for the concept of unidentified pain in humans. This pain may occur in individuals who experience one or more interactive and cumulative hazards: cognition/communication problems, being alone, absence of a surrogate/proxy report, or presence of known painful conditions or treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.