ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2024
Thrombogenic Risk Assessment of Transcatheter Prosthetic Heart Valves Using a Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embolic MINOCA From Mechanical Aortic Valve Thrombosis: A Potential Role of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Verification of a Fluid-Structure Interaction Model for Aortic Stenosis Through Comparison With In Vitro Experiments.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Development of a Polymeric TAVR Device Tailored to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients Using In Silico Design Optimization and Evaluation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Predicting procedural outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a scoping review of numerical patient-specific simulations.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveProsthetic heart valve interventions such as TAVR have surged over the past decade, but the associated complication of long-term, life-threatening thrombotic events continues to undermine patient outcomes. Thus, improving thrombogenic risk analysis of TAVR devices is crucial. In vitro studies for thrombogenicity are typically difficult to perform. However, revised ISO testing standards include computational testing for thrombogenic risk assessment of cardiovascular implants. We present a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach for assessing thrombogenic risk of transcatheter aortic valves.
methodsAn FSI framework was implemented via the incompressible computational fluid dynamics multi-physics solver of the ANSYS LS-DYNA software. The numerical modeling approach for flow analysis was validated by comparing the derived flow rate of the 29 mm CoreValve device from benchtop testing and orifice areas of commercial TAVR valves in the literature to in silico results. Thrombogenic risk was analyzed by computing stress accumulation (SA) on virtual platelets seeded in the flow fields via ANSYS EnSight. The integrated FSI-thrombogenicity methodology was subsequently employed to examine hemodynamics and thrombogenic risk of TAVR devices with two approaches: 1) engineering optimization and 2) clinical assessment.
resultsSimulated effective orifice areas for commercial valves were in reported ranges. In silico cardiac output and flow rate during the positive pressure differential period matched experimental results by approximately 93 %. The approach was used to analyze the effect of various TAVR leaflet designs on hemodynamics, where platelets experienced instantaneous stresses reaching around 10 Pa. Post-TAVR deployment hemodynamics in patient-specific bicuspid aortic valve anatomies revealed varying degrees of thrombogenic risk with the highest median SA around 70 dyn·s/cm
conclusionsOur methodology can be used to improve the thromboresistance of prosthetic valves from the initial design stage to the clinic. It allows for unparalleled optimization of devices, uncovering key TAVR leaflet design parameters that can be used to mitigate thrombogenic risk, in addition to patient-specific modeling to evaluate device performance. This work demonstrates the utility of advanced in silico analysis of TAVR devices that can be utilized for thrombogenic risk assessment of other blood recirculating devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.