Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39461075›Full record

ArticleBrain and cognition2024

Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input.

Joann Huizhen Tang, Selina S Solomon, Adam Kohn, Elyse S Sussman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joann Huizhen TangDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. Electronic address: joann.tang@gartner.com.
Selina S SolomonDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Adam KohnDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Department of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. Electronic address: adam.kohn@einsteinmed.edu.
Elyse S SussmanDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. Electronic address: elyse.sussman@einsteinmed.edu.

Funding

SUPPORT FOR THE ROSE F KENNEDY IDDRC P50P50HD105352 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SOPHIE MOLHOLM, Steven Upshaw Walkley · 2021 to 2026
$7.0M
Visual CrowdingR01EY028626 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KOHN, ADAM · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Learning and updating internal visual modelsR01EY024858 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KOHN, ADAM, SCHWARTZ, ODELIA · 2015 to 2017
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024858NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028626NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study investigated how the brain sets up expectations from stimulus regularities by evaluating the neural responses to expectations driven implicitly (by the stimuli themselves) and explicitly (by task demands). How the brain uses prior information to create expectations and what role attention plays in forming or holding predictions to efficiently respond to incoming sensory information is still debated. We presented temporal patterns of visual input while recording EEG under two different task conditions. When the patterns were task-relevant and pattern recognition was required to perform the button press task, three different event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited, each reflecting a different aspect of pattern expectation. In contrast, when the patterns were task-irrelevant, none of the neural indicators of pattern recognition or pattern violation detection were observed to the same temporally structured sequences. Thus, results revealed a clear distinction between expectation and attention that was prompted by task requirements. These results provide complementary pieces of evidence that implicit exposure to a stimulus pattern may not be sufficient to drive neural effects of expectations that lead to predictive error responses. Task-driven attentional control can dissociate from stimulus-driven expectations, to effectively minimize distracting information and maximize attentional regulation.

Indexed as

AttentionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalBrainFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVisual PerceptionYoung AdultEvent-related potentials (ERPs)ExpectationPredictive codingTemporal processingVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID39461075
PMCPMC11645222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.