ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Causal relationships between diseases mined from the literature improve the use of polygenic risk scores.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal knowledge graph analysis identifies adverse drug effects.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIdentifying causal relations between diseases allows for the study of shared pathways, biological mechanisms, and inter-disease risks. Such causal relations can facilitate the identification of potential disease precursors and candidates for drug re-purposing. However, computational methods often lack access to these causal relations. Few approaches have been developed to automatically extract causal relationships between diseases from unstructured text, but they are often only focused on a small number of diseases, lack validation of the extracted causal relations, or do not make their data available.
resultsWe automatically mined statements asserting a causal relation between diseases from the scientific literature by leveraging lexical patterns. Following automated mining of causal relations, we mapped the diseases to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) identifiers to allow the direct application to clinical data. We provide quantitative and qualitative measures to evaluate the mined causal relations and compare to UK Biobank diagnosis data as a completely independent data source. The validated causal associations were used to create a directed acyclic graph that can be used by causal inference frameworks. We demonstrate the utility of our causal network by performing causal inference using the do-calculus, using relations within the graph to construct and improve polygenic risk scores, and disentangle the pleiotropic effects of variants. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data are available through https://github.com/bio-ontology-research-group/causal-relations-between-diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.