Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460925›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Quantitative High-Throughput and High-Sensitivity Glycoprofile Analysis of Therapeutic Glycoproteins Using HILIC-FLD and ESI-MS.

Yongjing Xie, Michael Butler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yongjing XieNational Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael ButlerNational Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Dublin, Ireland. michael.butler@nibrt.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein glycosylation is recognized as a Critical Quality Attribute for the biological and therapeutic activity of many recombinant proteins. Therefore, glycosylation should be monitored rigorously to ensure the desired quality, safety, and potency of monoclonal antibodies and other therapeutic glycoproteins. However, glycans are highly heterogeneous structures in proteins, and this poses a challenge for glycoprofile analysis. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection has been recognized as a standard method for separation and quantification of released N-glycans after conventional 2-aminobenzamide labeling, but the sample preparation procedure is time-consuming with low sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Here we present a streamlined 96-well plate format platform for high-throughput and high-sensitivity glycan profiling. By taking advantage of rapid glycoprotein denaturation, enzymatic deglycosylation, highly sensitive fluorescent derivation, and on-matrix glycan cleanup, the reaction time has been shortened significantly to approximately 10 min. A detailed workflow including two-dimensional chromatography fractionation, exoglycosidase sequential digestion, mass spectroscopy glycan mass confirmation, and data interpretation is described. Potential pitfalls and precautions to be taken to ensure data accuracy are also discussed in this chapter.

Indexed as

GlycoproteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsPolysaccharidesSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationAntibodies, MonoclonalChromatography, LiquidGlycosylationHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalGlycoproteinsPolysaccharidesBiotherapeuticsCritical quality attributeExoglycosidase digestionGlycomicsGlycoproteinGlycosylationHILIC-FLDInstantPCMonoclonal antibodyN-glycan analysis

Identifiers

PMID39460925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.