Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460920›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Separation and Purification of CHO Secretome and Extracellular Vesicles for Proteome Analysis.

Maren Lehmkuhl, Christoph Keysberg, Kerstin Otte, Thomas Noll, Raimund Hoffrogge

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maren LehmkuhlCell Culture Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christoph KeysbergUniversity of Applied Sciences Biberach, Biberach, Germany.
Kerstin OtteUniversity of Applied Sciences Biberach, Biberach, Germany.
Thomas NollCell Culture Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Raimund HoffroggeCell Culture Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. raimund.hoffrogge@uni-bielefeld.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, host cell proteins (HCPs) have been investigated as putative contaminants in downstream processing of biopharmaceutical products of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. However, little is still known about the composition of the entire protein and vesicle environment in CHO cultivations. Ever evolving mass spectrometry techniques allow more and more insights into cell-cell communication processes and the composition of extracellular matrix, proteases, and further actively segregated compounds such as extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs themselves are a heterologous group consisting of exosomes, ectosomes, and apoptotic vesicles. To specifically analyze these subsets of the secretome and determine beneficial and detrimental factors for a production process, targeted separation and purification techniques are necessary.In this chapter, we present our optimized workflows for a clear differentiation between directly secreted proteins and the vesicular protein content of different fractions (especially exosomal small EVs) from CHO cell supernatant for proteomic analysis by NanoLC ESI-MS.

Indexed as

CricetulusExtracellular VesiclesProteomeProteomicsAnimalsCHO CellsExosomesSecretomeProteomeChinese hamster ovary cellsEctosomesExosomesExtracellular vesicles (EVs)Monoclonal antibodiesNanoLC ESI-MSProteomicsSecretome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.