Observational studyCardiovascular drugs and therapy2025
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with left main Coronary Artery Stenting.
Observational study in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Left Main Coronary Artery: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Limitations in PAR1-Targeted Screening of Antithrombotic Phytochemicals.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Complete revascularization and heart failure risk in acute coronary syndrome across the ejection fraction spectrum: focus on LVEF-dependent effects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe left main (LM) coronary artery disease poses high risks for its special anatomical characteristics. Optimal antiplatelet therapy is still controversial in this disease. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery.
methodsWe analyzed 3221 patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery from January 2011 to June 2022. Patients were separated into two groups: the ticagrelor group (n = 1550) and the clopidogrel group (n = 1671). Baseline data were balanced by propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding, defined as BARC 3, 5 bleeding.
resultsAfter propensity score matching (n = 1228 in each group), ticagrelor was linked to a lower incidence of all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel after a three-year follow-up (5.7% vs. 8.5%; HR:0.728; 95%CI:0.537-0.985, P = 0.040). Ticagrelor treatment reduced target lesion revascularization (3.3% vs. 6.4%; HR: 0.542; 95%CI: 0.371-0.791, P = 0.001) and stent thrombosis (1.6% vs. 3.7%; HR: 0.459; 95%CI: 0.271-0.776, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Multivariate COX analysis suggested that age, heart rate, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, ticagrelor, DAPT duration, LM true-bifurcation, LM stent diameters, and IVUS were independent predictive parameters of all-cause death.
conclusionsTicagrelor was associated with lower all-cause mortality and no increased risk of major bleeding compared to clopidogrel in LM stenting patients. Thus, ticagrelor can be considered a viable substitute for clopidogrel in LM disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39460906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.