ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2024
AMBER: A Modular Model for Tumor Growth, Vasculature and Radiation Response.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid multiscale model for predicting CAR-T therapy outcomes in solid tumors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mathematical model of tumor-macrophage dynamics in glioma to advance myeloid-targeted therapies.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Mathematical model of tumor-macrophage dynamics in glioma to advance myeloid-targeted therapies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Optimal Fractionation Scheduling for Radiotherapy Treatments with Reinforcement Learning, Tumor Growth Modeling and Outcome Modeling.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Sequencing microsphere selective internal radiotherapy after external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: proof of concept of a synergistic combination.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models of tumor growth are valuable for simulating the dynamics of cancer progression and treatment responses. In particular, agent-based models (ABMs) tracking individual agents and their interactions are useful for their flexibility and ability to model complex behaviors. However, ABMs have often been confined to small domains or, when scaled up, have neglected crucial aspects like vasculature. Additionally, the integration into tumor ABMs of precise radiation dose calculations using gold-standard Monte Carlo (MC) methods, crucial in contemporary radiotherapy, has been lacking. Here, we introduce AMBER, an Agent-based fraMework for radioBiological Effects in Radiotherapy that computationally models tumor growth and radiation responses. AMBER is based on a voxelized geometry, enabling realistic simulations at relevant pre-clinical scales by tracking temporally discrete states stepwise. Its hybrid approach, combining traditional ABM techniques with continuous spatiotemporal fields of key microenvironmental factors such as oxygen and vascular endothelial growth factor, facilitates the generation of realistic tortuous vascular trees. Moreover, AMBER is integrated with TOPAS, an MC-based particle transport algorithm that simulates heterogeneous radiation doses. The impact of radiation on tumor dynamics considers the microenvironmental factors that alter radiosensitivity, such as oxygen availability, providing a full coupling between the biological and physical aspects. Our results show that simulations with AMBER yield accurate tumor evolution and radiation treatment outcomes, consistent with established volumetric growth laws and radiobiological understanding. Thus, AMBER emerges as a promising tool for replicating essential features of tumor growth and radiation response, offering a modular design for future expansions to incorporate specific biological traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.