SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2024
Clinical features and effects of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To systematically evaluate clinical features and effects of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis. Databases including Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wan Fang, and VIP were electronically searched for studies on the use of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis, from inception to March 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. A meta-analysis was then performed. A total of 12 randomised controlled trial (RCT) studies were included. Compared with the control group, there were statistically significant differences in the effective rate, recurrence rate, erythema regression time, pustular resolution time, fever resolution time, and Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis. Moreover, the sub-group analysis showed that the effective rate of patients aged less than 40 years was significantly higher than that of the control group and the recurrence rate was significantly lower than that of the control group. The effective rate of psoriasis patients without nail lesions was significantly higher than that of control group. The effective rate of cyclosporin was significantly higher than that of dexamethasone acetate. There was no significant change in pooled sensitivity and specificity after each study was excluded one by one, indicating the stability of the meta-analysis. Cyclosporine had a high effective rate and low recurrence rate in the treatment of psoriasis, but it still had similar rate of adverse reactions compared to other drugs. This study systematically evaluated the effect of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis and provided reference for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39460805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.