Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460786›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Development and preliminary evaluation of a novel preoperative index for quantitative analysis of photoreceptor loss in full-thickness macular holes.

Alberto Quarta, Andrea Govetto, Annamaria Porreca, Lisa Toto, Marta Di Nicola, Maria Ludovica Ruggeri, Matteo Gironi, Mario Nubile, Luca Agnifili, Mario R Romano and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Current Topics in OCT Applications in Vitreoretinal Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alberto QuartaDepartment of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio", National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy. alberto.quarta.96@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-6124
Andrea GovettoOphthalmology Department, Vitreoretinal Division, Ospedale Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy.
Annamaria PorrecaLaboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, via dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Lisa TotoDepartment of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio", National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Marta Di NicolaLaboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, via dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Maria Ludovica RuggeriDepartment of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio", National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Matteo GironiDepartment of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio", National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Mario NubileDepartment of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio", National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Luca AgnifiliDepartment of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio", National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Mario R RomanoOphthalmology Department, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Humanitas University, Bergamo, Italy.
Rodolfo MastropasquaDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify novel quantitative parameters for evaluating photoreceptor loss in full-thickness macular holes (FTMH), exploring their potential clinical impact on postoperative functional and anatomical recovery.

methodsThis pilot study enrolled 38 eyes from 38 patients diagnosed with FTMH. Preoperatively, eyes underwent analysis and were subsequently followed for six months post-surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded, and cross-sectional images of FTMH were obtained using B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT) and en-face OCT. Quantitative assessment of ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM) integrity changes was conducted and correlated with postoperative anatomical and functional recovery. The photoreceptor Integrity Index (PIIN), calculated as the ratio of photoreceptor area to lumen hole area measured at customized segmentation, was correlated with the minimum and base diameters of the hole, positive change in BCVA, preoperative EZ defect (EZd), preoperative ELM defect (ELMd), and changes in EZ and ELM over the six-month follow-up period (∆-EZ and ∆-ELM). The main outcome measures focused on evaluating the effectiveness of PIIN in predicting postoperative anatomical and functional changes.

resultsA higher PIIN correlated with a greater BCVA change over six months (p < 0.001). Univariate regression analysis using the PIIN as a predictor for positive change in BCVA (|∆-BCVA| [logMAR]) over time yielded significant results (p < 0.001). Additionally, the PIIN significantly correlated with EZd at baseline, ELM at baseline, and ELMd change over the six-month follow-up period.

conclusionThe PIIN shows promise as a tool for evaluating photoreceptor loss in macular holes and estimating postoperative functional and anatomical recovery. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Previous studies have extensively used optical coherence tomography (OCT) to investigate various biomarkers for assessing patients with full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), without considering detailed MH ultrastructural features Existing indexes used to predict surgical outcomes for FTMH primarily depend on geometrical parameters and do not integrate detailed ultrastructural characteristics, such as cellular components.  What is new A novel concept introduces the quantitative measurement of residual photoreceptors located at the edge of FTMH. The Photoreceptor Integrity Index (PIIN) integrates different ultrastructural components of macular holes, aiming to become a valuable clinical tool to predict both anatomical and functional recovery outcomes following surgical intervention for FTMH.

Indexed as

Photoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinal PerforationsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesFull-thickness macular holeMacular hole bordersPhotoreceptorsPIIN

Identifiers

PMID39460786
PMCPMC11953196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.