Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460772›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Charting the growth through intelligence: A SWOC analysis on AI-assisted radiologic bone age estimation.

Gargi Jani, Bhoomika Patel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Artificial intelligence algorithm for bone age estimation].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gargi JaniSchool of Medico-Legal Studies, National Forensic Sciences University, Sector 9, Gandhinagar, 382007, Gujarat, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7617-6828
Bhoomika PatelSchool of Medico-Legal Studies, National Forensic Sciences University, Sector 9, Gandhinagar, 382007, Gujarat, India. drbhoomikampatel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0594-5452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone age estimation (BAE) is based on skeletal maturity and degenerative process of the skeleton. The clinical importance of BAE is in understanding the pediatric and growth-related disorders; whereas medicolegally it is important in determining criminal responsibility and establishing identification. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been used in the field of the field of medicine and specifically in diagnostics using medical images. AI can greatly benefit the BAE techniques by decreasing the intra observer and inter observer variability as well as by reducing the analytical time. The AI techniques rely on object identification, feature extraction and segregation. Bone age assessment is the classical example where the concepts of AI such as object recognition and segregation can be used effectively. The paper describes various AI based algorithms developed for the purpose of radiologic BAE and the performances of the models. In the current paper we have also carried out qualitative analysis using Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC) to examine critical factors that contribute to the application of AI in BAE. To best of our knowledge, the SWOC analysis is being carried out for the first time to assess the applicability of AI in BAE. Based on the SWOC analysis we have provided strategies for successful implementation of AI in BAE in forensic and medicolegal context.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonArtificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsChildForensic AnthropologyHumansArtificial intelligenceBone age estimationForensicMedicolegalSWOC analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.