ArticlemAbs
Practical solutions for overcoming artificial disulfide scrambling in the non-reduced peptide mapping characterization of monoclonal antibodies.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Purification of Advanced Therapeutics by Flow-Through Pseudo-Affinity Chromatography: Bi-Specific mABs, Fc Fusion Proteins, and Adeno-Associated Viruses.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- The optimized endolysosomal degradation assay with standardized enzyme activity represents an orthogonal method for predicting protein immunogenicity and T cell epitopes.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Structural characterization of intra- and intermolecular disulfide bonds in voltage-dependent anion channel 3 (VDAC3) protein from Rattus norvegicus by high-resolution mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-reduced peptide mapping provides essential data for characterizing therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by isolating disulfide connections between specific cysteines. However, conventional digestive strategies used throughout the biopharmaceutical industry have been shown to cause unintentional rearrangement of disulfide connections (disulfide scrambling), thus generating connectivity profiles that do not accurately represent the protein being analyzed. Common misconceptions (e.g. avoiding basic-pH digestion to prevent disulfide scrambling) have led to the development of alternative reagents and conditions that can alleviate this issue, but yield problematic digestion profiles. Herein, we systematically and comprehensively examine the primary considerations for accurate non-reduced peptide mapping, and provide effective, practical solutions to minimize undesired behavior while still yielding high-quality digests. Additionally, we present a method that exploits intentional disulfide scrambling as a reference tool to demonstrate the robustness of our proposed strategies. We also introduce maleimide as a cysteine-alkylating reagent and demonstrate its benefits over industry-leading analogs such as N-ethylmaleimide in terms of compatibility with regulatory reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.