Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460590›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2025

Management of human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-related acneiform rash: A position paper based on the first Europe/USA Delphi consensus process.

Z Apalla, A Freites-Martinez, K Grafanaki, A Ortiz-Brugues, V Nikolaou, D Fattore, P Sollena, S Deverapalli, S Babakoohi, A Galimont and 25 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Z ApallaSecond Dermatology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-8196
A Freites-MartinezDermatology Service, Hospital Ruber Juan Bravo, and Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3121-5667
K GrafanakiDermatology Department, Medical School of University of Patras, Rio, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-1928
A Ortiz-BruguesOncodermatology Department, Cancer University Institute, Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-0941
V NikolaouFirst Dermatology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-9152
D FattoreSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1925-1243
P SollenaDermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1632-7791
S DeverapalliTufts Medical Center Department of Dermatology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
S BabakoohiAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
A GalimontDermatology Department, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands.
N KlugerDepartment of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-8316
M Beylot-BarryDepartment of Dermatology, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-1229
C LaroccaDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
C IriarteDepartment of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J SmithUC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California, USA.
I TattersallDepartment of Dermatology, New York University, New York, USA.
R Dodiuk-GadFaculties of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.
M SauderPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5605-3844
C CarreraDermatology Department, Hospital Clinic and Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-8820
B KwongDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
M WhitleyDepartment of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
N LeboeufDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
P RomanoMaria Concetta Pucci Romano, Azienda Ospedaliera S.Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy.
M StaraceDermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3981-1527
V MateevaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University - Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
J RigantiDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J HirnerDepartment of Dermatology, University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, USA.
A B PatelDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
C M Reyes-HabitoLos Banos Doctors Hospital and Medical Center, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.
L KraehenbuehlDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5411-5661
M KheterpalDepartment of Dermatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
M FidaDermatology Department, University of Medicine of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-8995
J HasselMedical Faculty Heidelberg, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg (A Partnership Between DKFZ and University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany on behalf of the DECOG Committee Side Effects), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
M LacoutureDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-3710
V SibaudOncodermatology Department, Cancer University Institute, Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-6633

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a need for unified guidance in the management of acneiform rash induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) among dermatologists.

objectiveTo establish unified international guidelines for the management of acneiform rash caused by EGFR inhibitors, based on an experts' Delphi consensus.

methodsThe initiative was led by five members of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force 'Dermatology for Cancer Patients' who developed a questionnaire that was circulated to a group of 32 supportive oncodermatology experts in Europe, Canada, Argentina, the US States and Asia. The questionnaire consisted of 84 statements in total, regarding diagnosis and treatment of EGFRi-induced acneiform rash. Experts responded to an anonymous 5-point Likert scale survey. The coordinators collected the first-round responses that were checked for consensus (≥75% agreement in positive [agree or strongly agree] or in negative [disagree or strongly disagree] vote). The statements that did not reach strong consensus in the first round were revised, according to experts' feedback, for a second-round survey.

resultsStrong consensus was reached in 75/84 (89.3%) of the statements, whilst moderate consensus was achieved in 6/84 elements. Key points include consideration of low-dose isotretinoin for refractory grade II/III acneiform rash, use of topical steroid-sparing agents like topical pimecrolimus in the maintenance phase and use of doxycycline in either 100 or 200 mg per day as prophylactic treatment. Interestingly, experts did not recommend topical antibiotics, neither for prevention, nor for treatment. Consensus failure in 3/84 objects is mostly related to the lack of robust data on these topics.

conclusionThis consensus offers crucial insights often overlooked by radiotherapists, general practitioners, dermatologists and oncologists, and it is expected to improve the management of oncologic patients treated with EGFRi in different settings and continents.

Indexed as

Acneiform EruptionsErbB ReceptorsConsensusDelphi TechniqueEuropeHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID39460590
PMCPMC11934016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.