SynthesisAnnals of medicine2024
Informing factors and outcomes of self-assessment practices in medical education: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to Conduct Usability Testing of Medical Education Simulations: Methods Tutorial Using a Telemedicine Simulation for Maternal Care.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Mind the Gap: Rethinking Procedural Skill Assessment in Medical Residency.Southern medical journal · 2026Observational
- Evaluation of communication competence among undergraduate dental students in the pediatric dentistry clinic using 360-degree feedback: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Radiographic evaluation of root canal fillings: can undergraduate dental students perform it?BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Self-Monitoring Accuracy over Time for a Complex Diagnostic Skill.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Competency development in early nursing training: a cross-sectional OSCE study of self-assessment versus examiner ratings.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Enhancing self-regulated learning: a comparison of medical students' self-assessment and faculty evaluations on communication skills in simulated patient interviews.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Redesigning Advanced Life Support teaching and assessment using a constructive alignment approach.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a questionnaire for laboratory medicine knowledge and attitudes in clinical medical interns.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Self-Assessment in Medical Student Communication Performance.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-assessment (SA) is increasingly recognized not only as an assessment method but also as a vital learning activity that enables learners to identify their strengths and limitations, fostering a crucial skill for lifelong learning. Despite its acknowledged significance, there remains a gap in understanding SA
methodsA systematic review was conducted across five databases, employing a combination of keywords pertinent to SA and medical education. Our selection criteria deliberately excluded articles that solely focused on the accuracy of SA or used SA exclusively as a measure for other outcome variables. As a result, 39 studies met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed for this review. Qualitative narrative synthesis was used to summarize the informing factors. Furthermore, Kirkpatrick's model was employed to categorize and summarize the effects of SA activities across various educational outcome levels, including reactions, learning, and behavioral changes.
resultsOur review reveals that key factors influencing students' SA includes feedback from various stakeholders, peer assessment, the format of SA, and both learner and teacher training. Among the 39 studies examined, the majority demonstrated positive effects of SA on aspects such as attitudes and skills. However, a minority found no significant associations, with these outcomes frequently linked to contextual variables and how SA was implemented.
conclusionsOur review does not focus on SA accuracy or its role as an assessment method; instead it delves into the role of SA as an integral learning practice. We explored its influencing factors and its impact across various outcomes. The findings indicate that for SA to effectively enhance student learning outcomes, it must be implemented with ample support, clear guidelines, and within contexts that encourage feedback and reflection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.