ArticleVaccines2024
Does the Vaccination against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Offer Good Value for Money for Incidence Rates below the WHO Threshold for Endemicity? A Case Study for Germany.
Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health economic evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention in Germany: a scoping review.Health economics review · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- A novel integrated Markov-based model for vaccine cost-effectiveness in Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis: implications for further research.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Infection in a Two-Year-Old Child Returning from Switzerland (July-August 2023): Is It Time for TBE Immunization of Serbian Travelers?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infection affecting the central nervous system (CNS) with potential long-term consequences including neurological sequelae. Vaccination is critical to reduce TBE morbidity and mortality, as no antiviral treatment is available. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines areas with an incidence of ≥5 cases/100,000 PPY as highly endemic and recommends that vaccination is offered to all individuals in these areas. However, access to TBE vaccination depends on recommendations and funding by national or subnational decision-makers. We assessed if TBE vaccination could offer good value for money at incidences below this threshold.
methodsA closed-cohort Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of TBE vaccination. We compared primary vaccination applied to the whole population (aged above 1 year) and to a subpopulation aged between 60 and 85 years to a scenario without vaccination. Since TBE incidence is often underestimated, we included under-ascertained TBE cases and non-CNS TBE infections. Germany was used as a case study due to the availability of detailed incidence data.
resultsOur incidence threshold analysis showed that TBE vaccination offers good value for money well below the WHO threshold in most of the analyzed scenarios.
conclusionsOur results support a recommendation for TBE vaccination even in settings with low numbers of reported cases, especially for older patients. Furthermore, this analysis identified major research gaps regarding the costs, utilities, and clinical progression of TBE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.