Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460310›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Attitudes towards Maternal Immunisation of Polish Mothers: A Cross-Sectional, Non-Representative Study.

Iwona Kiersnowska, Kinga Kalita-Kurzyńska, Weronika Piekutowska-Kowal, Joanna Baranowska, Edyta Krzych-Fałta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iwona KiersnowskaDepartment Basic of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 27 Erazma Ciołka St., 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
Kinga Kalita-KurzyńskaDepartment of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw, 14/16 Litewska St., 00-575 Warsaw, Poland.
Weronika Piekutowska-KowalDepartment Basic of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 27 Erazma Ciołka St., 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna BaranowskaSt Sophia's Specialist Hospital, 90 Żelazna St., 01-004 Warsaw, Poland.
Edyta Krzych-FałtaDepartment Basic of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 27 Erazma Ciołka St., 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-7136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccination protects pregnant women against dangerous infectious diseases and contributes to disease prevention for the child until their vaccination schedule begins. Vaccination behaviour is related to attitudes concerning vaccine prevention. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional, non-representative study was conducted among Polish mothers using a diagnostic survey. We used the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale. The author's questionnaire included questions concerning experiences with adult and maternal vaccinations, as well as sociodemographic data.

resultsAmong the 375 respondents, more than half (n = 208, 55.47%) received at least one vaccine during pregnancy. The majority of respondents had a university education (n = 356, 94.93%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of receiving vaccines during pregnancy between respondents with and without a healthcare education (

conclusionsA key point may be to contribute to the vaccinology education of healthcare professionals, who play an important role in pregnant women's decision to be vaccinated. However, our results may be disrupted because the majority of the women in our study had a university education.

Indexed as

attitudematernal immunisationpregnancyvaccinationsVAX Scale

Identifiers

PMID39460310
PMCPMC11511576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.