ArticleVaccines2024
Immunogenicity and Safety of Omicron-Containing Multivalent COVID-19 Vaccines in Unvaccinated and Previously Vaccinated Adults.
Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 evolution trajectory remains uncertain, and the antigenic characteristics of future variants are highly unpredictable. We report the immunogenicity and safety of multivalent COVID-19 vaccines, SCTV01E and SCTV01E-1, against Omicron BA.5. This phase 2 trial randomized 400 adults into two cohorts, 160 unvaccinated (3 doses) and 240 previously vaccinated (2 doses) individuals to receive 30 µg SCTV01E-1 or 30 µg SCTV01E (1:1) between 4 November and 28 November 2022. Among the unvaccinated cohort, day 42 geometric mean fold rises (GMFRs) of neutralizing antibodies (nAb) against Omicron BA.5 were reported to be 12.8× and 20.5× over day 0 for SCTV01E-1 and SCTV01E, respectively. On day 178, both vaccines increased geometric mean titers (GMTs) of nAb against BA.5 following the booster dose compared to pre-booster levels on D150. Similar frequencies of solicited [6.2% (5/81) and 7.6% (6/79)] and unsolicited [11.1% (9/81) and 10.1% (8/79)] adverse events (AEs) were reported in SCTV01E-1 and SCTV01E groups, respectively. Grade 3 or more AEs were < 2% in both vaccine groups [SCTV01E-1: 1.2% (1/81), SCTV01E: 1.3% (1/79)]. In the previously vaccinated cohort, similar GMFRs were reported on day 28 (SCTV01E-1: 9.4× and SCTV01E: 8.7×) over baseline (D0). On day 148, both vaccines showed increased nAb levels with similar GMFRs over D120. Comparable incidences of solicited [13.2% (16/121) and 10.9% (13/119)] and unsolicited [17.4% (21/121) and 10.9% (13/119)] AEs were reported in SCTV01E-1 and SCTV01E groups, respectively. Numerically identical ≥ grade 3 AEs [SCTV01E-1: 1.7% (2/121) and SCTV01E: 1.7% (2/119)] were reported. This trial demonstrates the effectiveness of updated multivalent vaccines with acceptable safety profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.