ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
How to Make the Skin Contact Area Controllable by Optical Calibration in Wearable Tactile Displays of Softness.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual reality systems may benefit from wearable (fingertip-mounted) haptic displays capable of rendering the softness of virtual objects. According to neurophysiological evidence, the easiest reliable way to render a virtual softness is to generate purely tactile (as opposed to kinaesthetic) feedback to be delivered via a finger-pulp-interfaced deformable surface. Moreover, it is necessary to control not only the skin indentation depth by applying quasi-static (non-vibratory) contact pressures, but also the skin contact area. This is typically impossible with available devices, even with those that can vary the contact area, because the latter cannot be controlled due to the complexity of sensing it at high resolutions. This causes indetermination on an important tactile cue to render softness. Here, we present a technology that allows the contact area to be open-loop controlled via personalised optical calibrations. We demonstrate the solution on a modified, pneumatic wearable tactile display of softness previously described by us, consisting of a small chamber containing a transparent membrane inflated against the finger pulp. A window on the device allowed for monitoring the skin contact area with a camera from an external unit to generate a calibration curve by processing photos of the skin membrane interface at different pressures. The solution was validated by comparisons with an ink-stain-based method. Moreover, to avoid manual calibrations, a preliminary automated procedure was developed. This calibration strategy may be applied also to other kinds of displays where finger pulps are in contact with transparent deformable structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.