ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Lumbar Sitting Behavior of Individuals with Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study Using Extended Real-World Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards the Real-World Analysis of Lumbar Spine Standing Posture in Individuals with Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- The Kinematic Relationship Between Two Spinal Regions and the Hip During Transitions From Standing to Sitting and Vice Versa.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low back pain affects 619 million people worldwide and is commonly provoked by sitting. Current assessment methods constrain task variability, removing real-world, task-switching behaviors. This study utilized accelerometers to provide an original validated method of in vivo real-world assessment of lumbar sitting behavior throughout a full day. A three-stage study design was used, which involved (1) blinded verification of our sitting detection algorithm, (2) full-day data collection from participants with low back discomfort, quantifying lumbar angles, and end-user acceptability explored, (3) case study application to two clinical low back pain (LBP) patients, incorporating measurement of provocative sitting. Focus group discussions demonstrated that data collection methods were acceptable. Sitting 'windows' were created and analyzed using novel histograms, amplitude probability distribution functions, and variability, demonstrating that sitting behavior was unique and varied across individuals. One LBP patient demonstrated two frequent lumbar postures (<15% flexion and ~75% flexion), with pain provocation at 62% lumbar flexion. The second patient demonstrated a single dominant posture (~90% flexion), with pain provoked at 86% lumbar flexion. Our in vivo approach offers an acceptable method to gain new insights into provocative sitting behavior in individuals with LBP, allowing individualized unconstrained data for full-day postures and pain provocation behaviors to be quantified, which are otherwise unattainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.