Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460222›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Sensing and Perception in Robotic Weeding: Innovations and Limitations for Digital Agriculture.

Redmond R Shamshiri, Abdullah Kaviani Rad, Maryam Behjati, Siva K Balasundram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Redmond R ShamshiriLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5775-9654
Abdullah Kaviani RadDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71946-85111, Iran.
Maryam BehjatiLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.
Siva K BalasundramDepartment of Agriculture Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-6618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenges and drawbacks of manual weeding and herbicide usage, such as inefficiency, high costs, time-consuming tasks, and environmental pollution, have led to a shift in the agricultural industry toward digital agriculture. The utilization of advanced robotic technologies in the process of weeding serves as prominent and symbolic proof of innovations under the umbrella of digital agriculture. Typically, robotic weeding consists of three primary phases: sensing, thinking, and acting. Among these stages, sensing has considerable significance, which has resulted in the development of sophisticated sensing technology. The present study specifically examines a variety of image-based sensing systems, such as RGB, NIR, spectral, and thermal cameras. Furthermore, it discusses non-imaging systems, including lasers, seed mapping, LIDAR, ToF, and ultrasonic systems. Regarding the benefits, we can highlight the reduced expenses and zero water and soil pollution. As for the obstacles, we can point out the significant initial investment, limited precision, unfavorable environmental circumstances, as well as the scarcity of professionals and subject knowledge. This study intends to address the advantages and challenges associated with each of these sensing technologies. Moreover, the technical remarks and solutions explored in this investigation provide a straightforward framework for future studies by both scholars and administrators in the context of robotic weeding.

Indexed as

agriculturedigitalrobotic weedingrobotsweed

Identifiers

PMID39460222
PMCPMC11510896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.