ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Sensing and Perception in Robotic Weeding: Innovations and Limitations for Digital Agriculture.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermal image segmentation in weedy fields via synthetic RGB-trained models and GAN-based cross-modality alignment.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The challenges and drawbacks of manual weeding and herbicide usage, such as inefficiency, high costs, time-consuming tasks, and environmental pollution, have led to a shift in the agricultural industry toward digital agriculture. The utilization of advanced robotic technologies in the process of weeding serves as prominent and symbolic proof of innovations under the umbrella of digital agriculture. Typically, robotic weeding consists of three primary phases: sensing, thinking, and acting. Among these stages, sensing has considerable significance, which has resulted in the development of sophisticated sensing technology. The present study specifically examines a variety of image-based sensing systems, such as RGB, NIR, spectral, and thermal cameras. Furthermore, it discusses non-imaging systems, including lasers, seed mapping, LIDAR, ToF, and ultrasonic systems. Regarding the benefits, we can highlight the reduced expenses and zero water and soil pollution. As for the obstacles, we can point out the significant initial investment, limited precision, unfavorable environmental circumstances, as well as the scarcity of professionals and subject knowledge. This study intends to address the advantages and challenges associated with each of these sensing technologies. Moreover, the technical remarks and solutions explored in this investigation provide a straightforward framework for future studies by both scholars and administrators in the context of robotic weeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.