Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460218›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Overview of Software Sensor Applications in Biosystem Monitoring and Control.

Nasem Badreldin, Xiaodong Cheng, Ali Youssef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nasem BadreldinDepartment of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, 13 Freedman Crescent, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2539-6972
Xiaodong ChengMathematical and Statistical Methods Group (Biometris), Department of Plant Science, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-8201
Ali YoussefAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9986-5324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review highlights the critical role of software sensors in advancing biosystem monitoring and control by addressing the unique challenges biological systems pose. Biosystems-from cellular interactions to ecological dynamics-are characterized by intrinsic nonlinearity, temporal variability, and uncertainty, posing significant challenges for traditional monitoring approaches. A critical challenge highlighted is that what is typically measurable may not align with what needs to be monitored. Software sensors offer a transformative approach by integrating hardware sensor data with advanced computational models, enabling the indirect estimation of hard-to-measure variables, such as stress indicators, health metrics in animals and humans, and key soil properties. This article outlines advancements in sensor technologies and their integration into model-based monitoring and control systems, leveraging the capabilities of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, wearables, remote sensing, and smart sensors. It provides an overview of common methodologies for designing software sensors, focusing on the modelling process. The discussion contrasts hypothetico-deductive (mechanistic) models with inductive (data-driven) models, illustrating the trade-offs between model accuracy and interpretability. Specific case studies are presented, showcasing software sensor applications such as the use of a Kalman filter in greenhouse control, the remote detection of soil organic matter, and sound recognition algorithms for the early detection of respiratory infections in animals. Key challenges in designing software sensors, including the complexity of biological systems, inherent temporal and individual variabilities, and the trade-offs between model simplicity and predictive performance, are also discussed. This review emphasizes the potential of software sensors to enhance decision-making and promote sustainability in agriculture, healthcare, and environmental monitoring.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesEnvironmental MonitoringHumansInternet of Thingsbiosystemscontroldigital agriculturemachine-learningmonitoringsoftware sensors

Identifiers

PMID39460218
PMCPMC11511387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.