Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460185›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluation of the ActiMotus Software to Accurately Classify Postures and Movements in Children Aged 3-14.

Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Danica Hendry, George Thomas, Amber Beynon, Sarah Michelle Stearne, Juliana Zabatiero, Paul Davey, Jon Roslyng Larsen, Andrew Lloyd Rohl, Leon Straker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charlotte Lund RasmussenSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2193-5019
Danica HendrySchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8701-2212
George ThomasSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-7974
Amber BeynonSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1302-4429
Sarah Michelle StearneSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5278-2532
Juliana ZabatieroSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-7544
Paul DaveySchool of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2119-8066
Jon Roslyng LarsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0373-9305
Andrew Lloyd RohlARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, Brisbane, ACT 2609, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0038-2785
Leon StrakerSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-4128
Amity CampbellSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6461-6280

Funding

the Australian Research Council CE200100022the Curtin School of Allied Health 2022 Teaching and Research Grant NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActiMotus, a thigh-accelerometer-based software used for the classification of postures and movements (PaMs), has shown high accuracy among adults and school-aged children; however, its accuracy among younger children and potential differences between sexes are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ActiMotus to measure PaMs among children between 3 and 14 years and to assess if this was influenced by the sex or age of children.

methodForty-eight children attended a structured ~1-hour data collection session at a laboratory. Thigh acceleration was measured using a SENS accelerometer, which was classified into nine PaMs using the ActiMotus software. Human-coded video recordings of the session provided the ground truth.

resultsBased on both F1 scores and balanced accuracy, the highest levels of accuracy were found for lying, sitting, and standing (63.2-88.2%). For walking and running, accuracy measures ranged from 48.0 to 85.8%. The lowest accuracy was observed for classifying stair climbing. We found a higher accuracy for stair climbing among girls compared to boys and for older compared to younger age groups for walking, running, and stair climbing.

conclusionsActiMotus could accurately detect lying, sitting, and standing among children. The software could be improved for classifying walking, running, and stair climbing, particularly among younger children.

Indexed as

AccelerometryMovementPostureSoftwareAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRunningWalkingaccelerometryphysical activitysedentary behaviourvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39460185
PMCPMC11510827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.