Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460074›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Foot-Floor Contact Sequences: A Metric for Gait Assessment in Parkinson's Disease after Deep Brain Stimulation.

Marco Ghislieri, Valentina Agostini, Laura Rizzi, Chiara Fronda, Marco Knaflitz, Michele Lanotte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco GhislieriBIOLAB, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications of Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7626-1563
Valentina AgostiniBIOLAB, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications of Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5887-1499
Laura RizziDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-2843-8786
Chiara FrondaAOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Marco KnaflitzBIOLAB, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications of Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5396-5103
Michele LanotteDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4184-028X

Funding

European Union - Next generation EU within the PRIN 2022 program 2022KWSJJT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital gait monitoring is increasingly used to assess locomotion and fall risk. The aim of this work is to analyze the changes in the foot-floor contact sequences of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients in the year following the implantation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). During their best-ON condition, 30 PD patients underwent gait analysis at baseline (T0), at 3 months after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery (T1), and at 12 months (T2) after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery. Thirty age-matched controls underwent gait analysis once. Each subject was equipped with bilateral foot-switches and a 5 min walk was recorded, including both straight-line and turnings. The walking speed, turning time, stride time variability, percentage of atypical gait cycles, stance, swing, and double support duration were estimated. Overall, the gait performance of PD patients improved after DBS, as also confirmed by the decrease in their UPDRS-III scores from 19.4 ± 1.8 to 10.2 ± 1.0 (T0 vs. T2) (

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisParkinson DiseasePostural BalanceDeep Brain StimulationFemaleFootHumansLocomotionMaleMiddle AgedDBSfoot–floor contactgait analysislocomotionPDUPDRS

Identifiers

PMID39460074
PMCPMC11510800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.