ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation of the Working Mechanism of a Newly Developed Powered Ankle-Foot Orthosis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed to children with cerebral palsy (CP). The conventional AFO successfully controls the first and second ankle rocker, but it fails to correct the third ankle rocker, which negatively effects push-off power. The current study evaluated a new powered AFO (PAFO) design, developed to address the shortcomings of the conventional AFO. Eight children with spastic CP (12.4 ± 3.4 years; GMFCS I-III; 4/4-♂/♀; 3/5-bi/unilateral) were included. Sagittal kinematic and kinetic data were collected from 20 steps during barefoot walking, with conventional AFOs and PAFOs. In the PAFO-condition, an actuation unit was attached to a hinged AFO and through push-pull cables to a backpack that was carried by the child and provided patient-specific assistance-as-needed. SnPM-analysis indicated gait cycle sections that differed significantly between conditions. For the total group, differences between the three conditions were found in ankle kinematics (49.6-66.1%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.