ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Ultrasonic Weld Quality Inspection Involving Strength Prediction and Defect Detection in Data-Constrained Training Environments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Welding is an extensively used technique in manufacturing, and as for every other process, there is the potential for defects in the weld joint that could be catastrophic to the manufactured products. Different welding processes use different parameter settings, which greatly impact the quality of the final welded products. The focus of research in weld defect detection is to develop a non-destructive testing method for weld quality assessment based on observing the weld with an RGB camera. Deep learning techniques have been widely used in the domain of weld defect detection in recent times, but the majority of them use, for example, X-ray images. An RGB image-based solution is attractive, as RGB cameras are comparatively inexpensive compared to X-ray image solutions. However, the number of publicly available RGB image datasets for weld defect detection is comparatively lower than that of X-ray image datasets. This work achieves a complete weld quality assessment involving lap shear strength prediction and visual weld defect detection from an extremely limited dataset. First, a multimodal dataset is generated by the fusion of image data features extracted using a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) designed in this experiment and input parameter settings data. The fusion of the dataset reduced lap shear strength (LSS) prediction errors by 34% compared to prediction errors using only input parameter settings data. This is a promising result, considering the extremely small dataset size. This work also achieves visual weld defect detection on the same limited dataset with the help of an ultrasonic weld defect dataset generated using offline and online data augmentation. The weld defect detection achieves an accuracy of 74%, again a promising result that meets standard requirements. The combination of lap shear strength prediction and visual defect detection leads to a complete inspection to avoid premature failure of the ultrasonic weld joints. The weld defect detection was compared against the publicly available image dataset for surface defect detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.