Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460021›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploiting Temporal Features in Calculating Automated Morphological Properties of Spiky Nanoparticles Using Deep Learning.

Muhammad Aasim Rafique

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muhammad Aasim RafiqueDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer Sciences & Information Technology, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2896-3162

Funding

Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia KFU241727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object segmentation in images is typically spatial and focuses on the spatial coherence of pixels. Nanoparticles in electron microscopy images are also segmented frame by frame, with subsequent morphological analysis. However, morphological analysis is inherently sequential, and a temporal regularity is evident in the process. In this study, we extend the spatially focused morphological analysis by incorporating a fusion of hard and soft inductive bias from sequential machine learning techniques to account for temporal relationships. Previously, spiky Au nanoparticles (Au-SNPs) in electron microscopy images were analyzed, and their morphological properties were automatically generated using a hourglass convolutional neural network architecture. In this study, recurrent layers are integrated to capture the natural, sequential growth of the particles. The network is trained with a spike-focused loss function. Continuous segmentation of the images explores the regressive relationships among natural growth features, generating morphological statistics of the nanoparticles. This study comprehensively evaluates the proposed approach by comparing the results of segmentation and morphological properties analysis, demonstrating its superiority over earlier methods.

Indexed as

nanoparticle morphologysemantic segmentationspatiotemporal network

Identifiers

PMID39460021
PMCPMC11511305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.