Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39460013›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Accuracy of Three Commercial Wearable Devices for Sleep Tracking in Healthy Adults.

Rebecca Robbins, Matthew D Weaver, Jason P Sullivan, Stuart F Quan, Katherine Gilmore, Samantha Shaw, Abigail Benz, Salim Qadri, Laura K Barger, Charles A Czeisler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precision sleep signatures to predict mental health outcomes in youth.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Night Watch: A Survey of Older Adult Sleep-Tracking.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Smart Ring in Clinical Medicine: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rebecca RobbinsDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0288-2505
Matthew D WeaverDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-336X
Jason P SullivanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Stuart F QuanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9474-7679
Katherine GilmoreDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-0196-2132
Samantha ShawDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abigail BenzDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Salim QadriDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Laura K BargerDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Charles A CzeislerDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jeanne F DuffyDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4177-4179

Funding

The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541Oura Ring Inc N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep tracking by consumers is becoming increasingly prevalent; yet, few studies have evaluated the accuracy of such devices. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of three devices (Oura Ring Gen3, Fitbit Sense 2, and Apple Watch Series 8) compared to the gold standard sleep assessment (polysomnography (PSG)). Thirty-five participants (aged 20-50 years) without a sleep disorder were enrolled in a single-night inpatient study, during which they wore the Oura Ring, Fitbit, and Apple Watch, and were monitored with PSG. For detecting sleep vs. wake, the sensitivity was ≥95% for all devices. For discriminating between sleep stages, the sensitivity ranged from 50 to 86%, as follows: Oura ring sensitivity 76.0-79.5% and precision 77.0-79.5%; Fitbit sensitivity 61.7-78.0% and precision 72.8-73.2%; and Apple sensitivity 50.5-86.1% and precision 72.7-87.8%. The Oura ring was not different from PSG in terms of wake, light sleep, deep sleep, or REM sleep estimation. The Fitbit overestimated light (18 min;

Indexed as

PolysomnographySleepWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleep StagesYoung AdultApple Watchconsumer sleep tracking devicesFitbitOura ringpolysomnographysleep technologyvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39460013
PMCPMC11511193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.