ReviewViruses2024
Minimally Modified HIV-1 Infection of Macaques: Development, Utility, and Limitations of Current Models.
Review in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking non-human primate models for emerging viral infections after COVID-19.Laboratory animal research · 2026Review
- CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 infection in an immunocompetent monkey model.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Humanizing Mice for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Studies.Current protocols · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonhuman primate (NHP) studies that utilize simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) to model human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection have proven to be powerful, highly informative research tools. However, there are substantial differences between SIV and HIV-1. Accordingly, there are numerous research questions for which SIV-based models are not well suited, including studies of certain aspects of basic HIV-1 biology, and pre-clinical evaluations of many proposed HIV-1 treatment, prevention, and vaccination strategies. To overcome these limitations of NHP models of HIV-1 infection, several groups have pursued the derivation of a minimally modified HIV-1 (mmHIV-1) capable of establishing pathogenic infection in macaques that authentically recapitulates key features of HIV-1 in humans. These efforts have focused on three complementary objectives: (1) engineering HIV-1 to circumvent species-specific cellular restriction factors that otherwise potently inhibit HIV-1 in macaques, (2) introduction of a C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5)-tropic envelope, ideally that can efficiently engage macaque CD4, and (3) correction of gene expression defects inadvertently introduced during viral genome manipulations. While some progress has been made toward development of mmHIV-1 variants for use in each of the three macaque species (pigtail, cynomolgus, and rhesus), model development progress has been most promising in pigtail macaques (PTMs), which do not express an HIV-1-restricting tripartite motif-containing protein 5 α (TRIM5α). In our work, we have derived a CCR5-tropic mmHIV-1 clone designated stHIV-A19 that comprises 94% HIV-1 genome sequence and replicates to high acute-phase titers in PTMs. In animals treated with a cell-depleting CD8α antibody at the time of infection, stHIV-A19 maintains chronically elevated plasma viral loads with progressive CD4+ T-cell loss and the development of acquired immune-deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining clinical endpoints. However, in the absence of CD8α+ cell depletion, no mmHIV-1 model has yet displayed high levels of chronic viremia or AIDS-like pathogenesis. Here, we review mmHIV-1 development approaches, the phenotypes, features, limitations, and potential utility of currently available mmHIV-1s, and propose future directions to further advance these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.