ReviewViruses2024
Interventions during Early Infection: Opening a Window for an HIV Cure?
Review in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of HIV humoral immunity during analytical treatment interruption.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2026Article
- T-cell receptor/CD28-targeted immunotherapeutics selectively drive naive T-cell expansion to generate functional HIV-specific responses.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Challenges of integrating HIV prevention and treatment in China's border mountain regions: a grounded theory study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The Proviral Reservoirs of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been a landmark achievement for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), an HIV cure has remained elusive. Elimination of latent HIV reservoirs that persist throughout HIV infection is the most challenging barrier to an HIV cure. The progressive HIV infection is marked by the increasing size and diversity of latent HIV reservoirs until an effective immune response is mobilized, which can control but not eliminate HIV infection. The stalemate between HIV replication and the immune response is manifested by the establishment of a viral set point. ART initiation during the early stage limits HIV reservoir development, preserves immune function, improves the quality of life, and may lead to ART-free viral remission in a few people living with HIV (PLWH). However, for the overwhelming majority of PLWH, early ART initiation alone does not cure HIV, and lifelong ART is needed to sustain viral suppression. A critical area of research is focused on determining whether HIV could be functionally cured if additional treatments are provided alongside early ART. Several HIV interventions including Block and Lock, Shock and Kill, broadly neutralizing antibody (bNAb) therapy, adoptive CD8+ T cell therapy, and gene therapy have demonstrated delayed viral rebound and/or viral remission in animal models and/or some PLWH. Whether or not their application during early infection can improve the success of HIV remission is less studied. Herein, we review the current state of clinical and investigative HIV interventions and discuss their potential to improve the likelihood of post-treatment remission if initiated during early infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.