Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39459840›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Soft Matter Electrolytes: Mechanism of Ionic Conduction Compared to Liquid or Solid Electrolytes.

Kyuichi Yasui, Koichi Hamamoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Battery-Inspired Electrochemical Synapses for Neuromorphic Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Possibility of Superconductivity ofMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyuichi YasuiNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Nagoya 463-8560, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-6675
Koichi HamamotoNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Nagoya 463-8560, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-9344

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJGX23SC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft matter electrolytes could solve the safety problem of widely used liquid electrolytes in Li-ion batteries which are burnable upon heating. Simultaneously, they could solve the problem of poor contact between electrodes and solid electrolytes. However, the ionic conductivity of soft matter electrolytes is relatively low when mechanical properties are relatively good. In the present review, mechanisms of ionic conduction in soft matter electrolytes are discussed in order to achieve higher ionic conductivity with sufficient mechanical properties where soft matter electrolytes are defined as polymer electrolytes and polymeric or inorganic gel electrolytes. They could also be defined by Young's modulus from about 105 Pa to 109 Pa. Many soft matter electrolytes exhibit VFT (Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann) type temperature dependence of ionic conductivity. VFT behavior is explained by the free volume model or the configurational entropy model, which is discussed in detail. Mostly, the amorphous phase of polymer is a better ionic conductor compared to the crystalline phase. There are, however, some experimental and theoretical reports that the crystalline phase is a better ionic conductor. Some methods to increase the ionic conductivity of polymer electrolytes are discussed, such as cavitation under tensile deformation and the microporous structure of polymer electrolytes, which could be explained by the conduction mechanism of soft matter electrolytes.

Indexed as

cavitation under tensile deformationconfigurational entropy modelcrystalline vs. amorphous phasesfree volume modelmerits and demeritsmicroporous structurepolymer electrolytespolymeric or inorganic gel electrolytessoft matter electrolytesVFT (Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann)-type behavior

Identifiers

PMID39459840
PMCPMC11509499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.