Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39459836›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Multiscale Models of CVD Process: Review and Prospective.

Yu Tian, Zefan Yan, Lin Jiang, Rongzheng Liu, Bing Liu, Youlin Shao, Xu Yang, Malin Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu TianInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Zefan YanHunan Valin Xiangtan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Xiangtan 411101, China.
Lin JiangInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Rongzheng LiuInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Bing LiuInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Youlin ShaoInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Xu YangInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Malin LiuInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2451-3452

Funding

National Major S&T Project ZX06901National Natural Science Foundation of China 22478220National Youth Talent Support Program 20224723061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a crucial technique in the preparation of high-quality thin films and coatings, and is widely used in various industries including semiconductor, optics, and nuclear fuel, due to its operation simplicity and high growth rate. The complexity of the CVD process arises from numerous parameters, such as precursor chemistry, temperature, pressure, gas flow dynamics, and substrate characteristics. These multiscale parameters make the optimization of the CVD process a challenging task. Numerical simulations are widely used to model and analyze the CVD complex systems, and can be divided into nanoscale, mesoscale, and macroscale methods. Numerical simulation is aimed at optimizing the CVD process, but the inter-scale parameters still need to be extracted in modeling processes. However, multiscale coupling modeling becomes a powerful method to solve these challenges by providing a comprehensive framework that integrates phenomena occurring at different scales. This review presents an overview of the CVD process, the common critical parameters, and an in-depth analysis of CVD models in different scales. Then various multiscale models are discussed. This review highlights the models in different scales, integrates these models into multiscale frameworks, discusses typical multiscale coupling CVD models applied in practice, and summarizes the parameters that can transfer information between different scales. Finally, the schemes of multiscale coupling are given as a prospective view. By offering a comprehensive view of the current state of multiscale CVD models, this review aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and provide insights that could lead to a more efficient and precise control of the CVD process.

Indexed as

CVDinter-scale couplingmechanismmultiscalenumerical simulation

Identifiers

PMID39459836
PMCPMC11509692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.