Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39459738›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Impact of Ultrasonic Welding Parameters on Weldability and Sustainability of Solid Copper Wires with and without Varnish.

Andraž Logar, Damjan Klobčar, Uroš Trdan, Aleš Nagode, Gregor Černivec, Tomaž Vuherer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andraž LogarBosch Rexroth d.o.o., 4210 Brnik, Slovenia.
Damjan KlobčarLaboratory for Welding, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-6130-0328
Uroš TrdanLaboratory for Welding, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0688-2919
Aleš NagodeDepartment of Materials and Metallurgy, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-2175-0516
Gregor ČernivecBosch Rexroth d.o.o., 4210 Brnik, Slovenia.
Tomaž VuhererLaboratory for Welding, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article contains an advanced analysis of the properties of solid wire electrical contacts produced by ultrasonic welding, both with and without varnish. The main disadvantage of ultrasonic welding of thin wires is the inability to achieve acceptable peel force and tensile strength, which is mainly due to the deformation and thinning of the wires. This study deals with ultrasonic welding using a ring of thin solid copper wires that minimises the deformation and thinning of the wires. The influence of welding parameters such as energy, pressure and amplitude were systematically analysed. Based on these parameters, the optimum welding programme and control method was determined to weld unvarnished and varnished wires. The investigations included electrical resistance tests, optical microscopy, micro-hardness measurements, peel tests and tensile tests, and the measurement of energy consumption. The results showed no significant differences in microstructure and hardness between varnished and unvarnished joints. Ultrasonic joints of varnished wires achieved lower electrical conductivity (by 38%), lower tensile strength (by 3%) and higher peel strength (by 7%), while the welding process was more sustainable in terms of energy (by 6.6%) and time consumption (without preprocessing).

Indexed as

electrical conductivityjoint strengthsolid copper wiressustainabilityultrasonic weldingvarnish

Identifiers

PMID39459738
PMCPMC11509339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.