Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39459724›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Leveraging Bayesian Optimization Software for Atomic Layer Deposition: Single-Objective Optimization of TiO

Philipp Häussermann, Nikhil Biju Joseph, Daniel Hiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philipp HäussermannInstitute of Applied Physics (IAP), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
Nikhil Biju JosephInstitute of Experimental Physics (IEP), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
Daniel HillerInstitute of Applied Physics (IAP), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 434030435Dr. Erich-Krüger Stiftung simMAT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrate the application of free-to-use and easy-to-implement Bayesian optimization (BO) software to streamline atomic layer deposition (ALD) process optimization. By employing machine learning-based Bayesian optimization algorithms, we enhanced the silicon surface passivation quality of titanium dioxide layers deposited using titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP). Unlike classical designs of experimental methods, such as Box-Behnken or Plackett-Burman designs, which require a predefined set of experiments and can become resource intensive, BO offers several advantages. It dynamically updates the search strategy based on previous outcomes, allowing for efficient exploration of parameter spaces with fewer experimental runs. This adaptive approach is particularly advantageous in small-scale experiments or laboratories where time, resources, and materials are limited. In a single-objective optimization experiment, we identified constrained search spaces that limited further optimization, underscoring the importance of properly defined parameter bounds prior to the optimization process. Our findings highlight that Bayesian optimization can not only reduce time and resource costs associated with ALD process optimization but also support faster discovery of more optimal ALD process parameters, even with minimal prior knowledge of the deposition process or precursor chemistry.

Indexed as

atomic layer deposition (ALD)Bayesian optimization (BO)process optimizationsilicon surface passivationtitanium dioxide (TiO2)

Identifiers

PMID39459724
PMCPMC11509461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.