ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024
New Insights into the Assessment of Peri-Operative Risk in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecological Neoplasms: A Call for a New Tool.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing tools for predicting postoperative complications in women undergoing surgery for gynecological neoplasms are evaluated in this narrative review. Although surgery is a very efficient therapy for gynecological tumors, it is not devoid of the possibility of negative postoperative outcomes. Widely used tools at present, such as the Surgical Apgar Score and the Modified Frailty Index, fail to consider the complex characteristics of gynecological malignancies and their related risk factors. A thorough search of the PubMed database was conducted for our review, specifically targeting studies that investigate several aspects impacting postoperative outcomes, including nutritional status, obesity, albumin levels, sodium levels, fluid management, and psychological well-being. Research has shown that both malnutrition and obesity have a substantial impact on postoperative mortality and morbidity. Diminished sodium and albumin levels together with compromised psychological well-being can serve as reliable indicators of negative consequences. The role of appropriate fluid management in enhancing patient recovery was also investigated. The evidence indicates that although current mechanisms are useful, they have limitations in terms of their range and do not thoroughly address these recently identified risk factors. Therefore, there is a need for a new, more comprehensive tool that combines these developing elements to more accurately forecast postoperative problems and enhance patient results in gynecological oncology. This paper highlights the need to create such a tool to improve clinical practice and the treatment of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.