Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39459437›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

Coeliac Disease in Children-A Clinical Review Including Novel Treatment Agents.

Chloe Corlett, Astor Rodrigues, Madhur Ravikumara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chloe CorlettDepartment of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital Oxford, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Astor RodriguesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital Oxford, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Madhur RavikumaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coeliac disease (CD) affects almost of 1% of the population, yet remains undiagnosed in the majority. Though the demonstration of enteropathy in duodenal biopsy was traditionally the essential criterion for the diagnosis of coeliac disease, the guidelines published by the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) in 2012, and revised in 2020, paved the way to a no-biopsy approach to diagnosis. In a select group of children meeting certain criteria, a definitive diagnosis of CD can now be made without the need for duodenal biopsies. This is being increasingly applied in clinical practice. It is well established that untreated coeliac disease is associated with several chronic adverse health conditions. At present, a strict gluten-free diet remains the only effective treatment for CD. The advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of CD have led to a search for alternative treatment agents. Several investigational agents are in various phases of clinical trials at present. In this review, we outline the clinical aspects of coeliac disease and summarise various investigational treatment agents.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeChildHumanschildrencoeliac diseasegluten-free dietnovel therapies

Identifiers

PMID39459437
PMCPMC11509383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.