The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Multi-model comparison and nomogram development for predicting in-hospital mortality in Trauma patients based on NLR and other indicators.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
   Article
2. An interpretable machine learning model integrating early immune biomarkers for predicting outcomes after spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2026
   Article
3. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictive Factor of Unfavorable Outcomes in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026
   Review
4. Study on the link between neutrophil percentage to albumin ratio and acute kidney injury in severe ischemic stroke patients during hospitalization.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as