Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39459222›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Enhancing Drug Solubility, Bioavailability, and Targeted Therapeutic Applications through Magnetic Nanoparticles.

Yue Zhuo, Yong-Gang Zhao, Yun Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Magnetic nanoparticles for cancer theranostics.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue ZhuoSchool of Biomedical Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 511442, China.
Yong-Gang ZhaoCollege of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7813-8419
Yun ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo 315100, China.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Project (No. 2024C03231)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological variability poses significant challenges in the development of effective therapeutics, particularly when it comes to drug solubility and bioavailability. Poor solubility across varying physiological conditions often leads to reduced absorption and inconsistent therapeutic outcomes. This review examines how nanotechnology, especially through the use of nanomaterials and magnetic nanoparticles, offers innovative solutions to enhance drug solubility and bioavailability. This comprehensive review focuses on recent advancements and approaches in nanotechnology. We highlight both the successes and remaining challenges in this field, emphasizing the role of continued innovation. Future research should prioritize developing universal therapeutic solutions, conducting interdisciplinary research, and leveraging personalized nanomedicine to address biological variability.

Indexed as

Biological AvailabilityMagnetite NanoparticlesSolubilityAnimalsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanomedicineNanotechnologyPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug CarriersMagnetite NanoparticlesPharmaceutical Preparationsbiological variabilitydrug absorptiondrug designdrug solubilitymagnetic nanoparticlesnanotechnologytargeted drug deliverytherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID39459222
PMCPMC11510236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.