ArticleMicromachines2024
Parallelization of Curved Inertial Microfluidic Channels to Increase the Throughput of Simultaneous Microparticle Separation and Washing.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rising global need for clean water highlights the importance of efficient sample preparation methods to separate and wash various contaminants such as microparticles. Microfluidic methods for these purposes have emerged but they mostly deliver either separation or washing, with very low throughputs. Here, we investigate parallelization of a curved-channel particle separation and washing device in order to increase its throughput for sample preparation. A curved microchannel applies inertial forces to focus larger 10 µm microparticles at the inner wall of the channel and separate them from smaller 5 µm microparticles at the outer wall. At the same time, Dean flow recirculation is used to exchange the carrier solution of the large microparticles to a clean buffer (washing). We increased the number of curved channels in a stepwise manner from two to four to eight channels in two different arraying designs, i.e., rectangular and polar arrays. We examined efficient separation of target 10 µm particles from 5 µm particles, while transferring the larger microparticles into a clean buffer. Dean flow recirculation studies demonstrated that the rectangular arrayed device performs better, providing solution exchange efficiencies of more than 96% on average as compared to 89% for the polar array device. Our 8-curve rectangular array device provided a particle separation efficiency of 98.93 ± 0.91%, while maintaining a sample purity of 92.83 ± 1.47% at a high working flow rate of 12.8 mL/min. Moreover, the target particles were transferred into a clean buffer with a solution exchange efficiency of 96.81 ± 0.54% in our 8-curve device. Compared to the literature, our in-plane parallelization design of curved microchannels resulted in a 13-fold increase in the working flow rate of the setup while maintaining a very high performance in particle separation and washing. Our microfluidic device offers the potential to enhance the throughput and the separation and washing efficiencies in applications for biological and environmental samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.