Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39458979›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Present Scenario and Future Landscape of Payloads for ADCs: Focus on DNA-Interacting Agents.

Barbara Valsasina, Paolo Orsini, Chiara Terenghi, Alberto Ocana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Antibody-drug conjugates in gastric cancer: clinical advances and resistance mechanisms.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Gynecologic Oncology: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara ValsasinaNerviano Medical Sciences, Viale Pasteur 10, 20014 Nerviano, Italy.
Paolo OrsiniNerviano Medical Sciences, Viale Pasteur 10, 20014 Nerviano, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-8427-0945
Chiara TerenghiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Via Mangiagalli 25, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Alberto OcanaExperimental Therapeutics Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), 2546 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-9630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ADCs have emerged as a promising class of therapeutics, combining the targeting specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the cytotoxic potency of small-molecule drugs. Although the majority of approved ADCs are still based on microtubule binder payloads, the recent success of topoisomerase I inhibitors has revitalized interest in the identification of novel agents overcoming present limitations in the field including narrow therapeutic window and chemoresistance. The success of DNA binders as payload for ADCs has been very limited, up to now, due, among other factors, to high hydrophobicity and planar chemical structures resulting in most cases in ADCs with a strong tendency to aggregate, poor plasma stability, and limited therapeutic index. Some of these molecules, however, continue to be of interest due to their favorable properties in terms of cytotoxic potency even in chemoresistant settings, bystander and immunogenic cell death effects, and known combinability with approved drugs. We critically evaluated several clinically tested ADCs containing DNA binders, focusing on payload physicochemical properties, cytotoxic potency, and obtained clinical results. Our analysis suggests that further exploration of certain chemical classes, specifically anthracyclines and duocarmycins, based on the optimization of physicochemical parameters, reduction of cytotoxic potency, and careful design of targeting molecules is warranted. This approach will possibly result in a novel generation of payloads overcoming the limitations of clinically validated ADCs.

Indexed as

ADCanthracyclinecalicheamicincancerDNA damageduocarmycinpayloadPBD

Identifiers

PMID39458979
PMCPMC11510327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.