Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39458819›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Backcrossing Failure between Sikitita Olive and Its Male Parent Arbequina: Implications for the Self-Incompatibility System and Pollination Designs of Olive Orchards.

Julián Cuevas, Fernando M Chiamolera, Virginia Pinillos, Francisco Rodríguez, Irene Salinas, Diego Cabello, Alenka Baruca Arbeiter, Dunja Bandelj, Marina Raboteg Božiković, Gabriela Vuletin Selak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julián CuevasDepartment of Agronomy, University of Almería, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-3383
Fernando M ChiamoleraDepartment of Agronomy, University of Almería, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4351-5146
Virginia PinillosDepartment of Agronomy, University of Almería, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8687-710X
Francisco RodríguezDepartment of Agronomy, University of Almería, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), 04120 Almería, Spain.
Irene SalinasDepartment of Agronomy, University of Almería, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1326-9079
Diego CabelloDepartment of Agronomy, University of Córdoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (ceiA3), 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3372-1595
Alenka Baruca ArbeiterFaculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-3546
Dunja BandeljFaculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia.
Marina Raboteg BožikovićInstitute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-7292-2504
Gabriela Vuletin SelakInstitute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation, 21000 Split, Croatia.

Funding

Junta de Andalucía as part of the Program FEDER P20-01071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backcrossing between Sikitita and its male parent Arbequina, offers the possibility to check the suitability of different self-incompatibility models proposed for olive. To determine Sikitita's response to self- and cross-pollination treatments, including pollination with its father Arbequina, we compared the parameters following pollen-pistil interaction, the resulting initial and final fruit set, and the paternity of the seeds produced under different crosses. The results showed that Sikitita behaves as a self-incompatible cultivar due to the inhibition of pollen tube growth in the pistil of self-pollinated flowers. This incompatibility reaction led to a significant reduction of self-fertilization and fruit set. Seed paternity analyses confirmed the self-incompatibility response of Sikitita. A similar incompatibility response was observed in Sikitita flowers when hand-pollinated with pollen of Arbequina and Koroneiki. On the contrary, cross-pollination with Arbosana gave excellent results, with analyses showing that pollen of Arbosana is largely preferred by Sikitita to father its seeds more than the pollen of other cultivars presented in the orchard. The backcross failure of Sikitita with Arbequina pollen suggests that the self-incompatibility system in olives is not of the gametophytic type. In contrast, pollination tests fit features of previously reported sporophytic self-incompatibility systems. However, some amendments are proposed, among them the incompatibility groups for Sikitita and Koroneiki.

Indexed as

fruit setgametophytic self-incompatibilityOlea europaeapollen–pistil interactionspollination groupspollinizer selectionseed paternitysporophytic self-incompatibility

Identifiers

PMID39458819
PMCPMC11510835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.