Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39458749›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of ABS-like Resin for Stereolithography Versus ABS for Fused Deposition Modeling in Three-Dimensional Printing Applications for Odontology.

Victor Paes Dias Gonçalves, Carlos Maurício Fontes Vieira, Noan Tonini Simonassi, Felipe Perissé Duarte Lopes, George Youssef, Henry A Colorado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters for the Production of Mouthguards.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor Paes Dias GonçalvesAdvanced Materials Laboratory-LAMAV, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro-UENF, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-602, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-5735
Carlos Maurício Fontes VieiraAdvanced Materials Laboratory-LAMAV, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro-UENF, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-602, RJ, Brazil.
Noan Tonini SimonassiAdvanced Materials Laboratory-LAMAV, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro-UENF, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-602, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3571-5001
Felipe Perissé Duarte LopesAdvanced Materials Laboratory-LAMAV, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro-UENF, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-602, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1867-6722
George YoussefExperimental Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2029-7692
Henry A ColoradoAdvanced Materials Laboratory-LAMAV, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro-UENF, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-602, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4948-0482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the differences in mechanical properties between acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) samples produced using fused deposition modeling (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA) using ABS filaments and ABS-like resin, respectively. The central question is to determine how these distinct printing techniques affect the properties of ABS and ABS-like resin and which method delivers superior performance for specific applications, particularly in dental treatments. The evaluation methods used in this study included Shore D hardness, accelerated aging, tensile testing, Izod impact testing, flexural resistance measured by a 3-point bending test, and compression testing. Poisson's ratio was also assessed, along with microstructure characterization, density measurement, confocal microscopy, dilatometry, wettability, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and nanoindentation. It was concluded that ABS has the same hardness in both manufacturing methods; however, the FDM process results in significantly superior mechanical properties compared to SLA. Microscopy demonstrates a more accurate sample geometry when fabricated with SLA. It is also concluded that printable ABS is suitable for applications in dentistry to fabricate models and surgical guides using the SLA and FDM methods, as well as facial protectors for sports using the FDM method.

Indexed as

3D printingacrylonitrile butadiene styreneodontologypolymer

Identifiers

PMID39458749
PMCPMC11511427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.