Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39458748›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Assessment of Physical and Mechanical Parameters of Spun-Bond Nonwoven Fabric.

Inga Lasenko, Jaymin Vrajlal Sanchaniya, Sai Pavan Kanukuntla, Arta Viluma-Gudmona, Sandra Vasilevska, Sanjay Rajni Vejanand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Effect of COPolymers · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inga LasenkoInstitute of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6B Kipsala Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-1554-3078
Jaymin Vrajlal SanchaniyaInstitute of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6B Kipsala Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-4300-8312
Sai Pavan KanukuntlaInstitute of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6B Kipsala Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-6647
Arta Viluma-GudmonaInstitute of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6B Kipsala Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.
Sandra VasilevskaFaculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, 2 Liela Street, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-7851
Sanjay Rajni VejanandInstitute of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6B Kipsala Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-6848-8431

Funding

Riga Technical University This research/publication was supported by Riga Technical University's Doctoral Grant program.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate fabric for technical applications, such as protective masks, hinges on a thorough understanding of the fabric's physical and mechanical properties. This study addresses the challenge of selecting the optimal material structure for the upper layer of a protective mask, aiming to ensure adequate breathability while providing effective filtration against airborne particles and contaminants. We assessed and compared the physical-mechanical properties of five polymer spun-bond nonwoven fabrics from different suppliers. Our comprehensive evaluation included, as follows: a visual inspection; light permeability analysis; mass and thickness measurements; elongation and tensile strength tests; breathing resistance assessments; and filter penetration tests with paraffin oil. The results revealed significant variations in performance among the samples, with one fabric consistently outperforming the others across multiple parameters. Notably, this top-performing fabric met or exceeded the EN 149:2001+A1:2009 standard for breathing resistance and filtration efficiency and, in combination with additional filter layers, met the requirements or exceeded class FFP2 (filtering face piece). This study underscores the importance of meticulous material selection and quality control in optimizing PPE (personal protective equipment) performance and user safety, providing valuable insights for mask manufacturers and healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

breathabilityfiltrationFPP2 masknonwovenphysical and mechanical propertiesspun-bond

Identifiers

PMID39458748
PMCPMC11510925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.