ArticlePolymers2024
Charge Mediated Changes to the Intrinsic Viscosity of Biopolymer Systems.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of E-Beam Irradiation on Solutions of Fullerene CPolymers · 2025Article
- Using the Herschel-Bulkley Consistency Index to Characterise Complex Biopolymer Systems-The Effect of Screening.Polymers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A theoretical approach is presented to quantify the effect of ionic strength on the swelling and shrinkage of the hydrodynamic coil size of a generic biopolymer. This was conducted in view of extraction methods that often utilize acids and alkali combinations and, therefore, invariably impact the levels of salt found in commercially available biopolymers. This approach is supplemented by intrinsic viscosity measurements for the purpose of validation across a variety of biopolymer architectures, type of functionalization, as well as the quoted molar mass. By accurately capturing the magnitude of change in the coil size, it is discussed how a biopolymer coil size is far more sensitive to changes in the ionic strength than it is to the molar mass (or contour length) itself. In turn, it is highlighted why the current characterization strategies that make use of weight-averaged molar mass are prone to errors and cannot be used to establish structure-property relationships for biopolymers. As an alternative, the scope of developing an accurate understanding of coil sizes due to changes in the "soft" interactions is proposed, and it is recommended to use the coil size itself to highlight the underlying structure-property relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.