ArticlePolymers2024
An Easy-to-Handle Route for Bicomponent Porous Tubes Fabrication as Nerve Guide Conduits.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, the development of nerve guide conduits (NGCs) has gained much attention due to the impellent need to find innovative strategies to take care of damaged or degenerated peripheral nerves in clinical surgery. In this view, significant effort has been spent on the development of high-performance NGCs by different materials and manufacturing approaches. Herein, a highly versatile and easy-to-handle route to process 3D porous tubes made of chitosan and gelatin to be used as a nerve guide conduit were investigated. This allowed us to fabricate highly porous substrates with a porosity that ranged from 94.07 ± 1.04% to 97.23 ± 1.15% and average pore sizes-estimated via X-ray computed tomography (XCT) reconstruction and image analysis-of hundreds of microns and an irregular shape with an aspect ratio that ranged from 0.70 ± 0.19 to 0.80 ± 0.15 as a function of the chitosan/gelatin ratio. More interestingly, the addition of gelatin allowed us to modulate the mechanical properties, which gradually reduced the stiffness-max strength from 0.634 ± 0.015 MPa to 0.367 ± 0.021 MPa-and scaffold toughness-from 46.2 kJ/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.