ArticlePharmaceutics2024
The Design of Novel 3D-Printed, Moulded, and Oral Viscous Budesonide Formulations for Paediatrics: A Comparative Evaluation of Their Mucoadhesive Properties.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional printing as a transformative platform for patient-centric pediatric drug delivery: technologies, formulation strategies and clinical translation.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPaediatric eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) treatment is challenging due to the limited number of age-appropriate formulations. This study aims to develop and evaluate oral viscous suspensions and solid formulations of budesonide (BUD), focusing on their in vitro mucoadhesive properties, to enhance drug delivery and therapeutic outcomes in paediatric EoE.
methodsThis study encompasses the development of oral viscous suspensions and orodispersible solid formulations (moulded tablets and 3D-printed dosage forms) containing BUD. The formulations underwent quality control tests as per the European Pharmacopoeia, chemical stability assessments, and an in vitro evaluation of their mucoadhesiveness properties.
resultsA validated analytical method enabled accurate BUD quantification and efficient extraction, and all developed formulations demonstrated chemical stability for 30 days, meeting Ph. Eur. quality standards. Three-dimensional printing using SSE successfully produced 1 mg and 0.5 mg BUD printlets, complying with quality tests for conventional tablets. Formulations containing xanthan gum (L2-XG and P1-0.5-XG) exhibited superior mucoadhesive properties. L2-XG showed significantly higher mucoadhesion than L1-MC. Among the solid formulations, P1-0.5-XG demonstrated the highest mucoadhesive properties.
conclusionsThis is the first study to develop solid oral dosage forms of BUD at a very low dose, specifically for paediatric use. The results highlight the potential of 3D printing for developing individualised orodispersible BUD formulations with improved bioadhesion for paediatric EoE treatment. The L2-XG formulation and the XG-containing printlets are the most promising formulations in terms of increasing contact time with the oesophageal mucosa, which could translate into improved therapeutic efficacy in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.